Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma ; (12): 109-115, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-745084

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare arthroscopic double-row bridging suture and minimally invasive locking plate system in the treatment of simple avulsion fracture of humeral greater tuberosity.Methods A retrospective study was conducted of the 93 patients with avulsion fracture of humeral greater tuberosity who had been treated at Orthopaedic Center,Beijing Luhe Hospital from January 2012 to December 2016.Of them,38 were treated by arthroscopic double-row bridging suture (ADRB) and 55 by open reduction and internal fixation with minimally invasive locking plate system (MIPS).Regular X-ray follow-ups were carried out at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively and every 6 months afterwards.Surgical time,range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score,Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and complications were recorded preoperatively and at the last follow-up.Results The patients of the arthroscopy and plate groups were comparable because there were no significant differences in the preoperative general data between them (P > 0.05).The average follow-up time for the 93 patients was 35.9months (from 12 to 60 months).The operation time for the arthroscopy group (97.0 ± 20.1 min) was significantly longer than that for the plate group (67.5 ± 19.0 min) (P < 0.05).At the last follow-up,anteflexion lift (152.6° ± 12.9°),abduction lift (154.0° ± 13.5°) and internal rotation angle at 90° (57.7° ±12.2°) in the arthroscopy group were significantly better than those in the plate group (134.9° ± 17.8°,129.5° ± 18.6° and 50.8° ± 12.9°,respectively) (P < 0.05).At the last follow-up,the ASES scores for the arthroscopy and plate groups were 88.5 ± 7.6 and 85.1 ± 11.3,respectively,showing no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05);the VAS scores for the 2 groups were 1.5 ± 1.2 and 2.2 ± 1.5 respectively,showing a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P < 0.05).There was no significant difference between the2 groups in improvement of ASES scores (P > 0.05).Ninety fractures healed after 3 months while 3 fractures in the arthroscopy group did after 6 months.In the plate group,7 patients developed shoulder stiffness 3 to 6 months after surgery and 3 ones reported pain during abduction.Conclusions Both ADRB and MIPS are an effective treatment for simple avulsion fracture of humeral greater tuberosity.MIPS fixation needs shorter surgical time while ADRB leads to better postoperative shoulder ROM.

2.
Clinical Medicine of China ; (12): 421-424, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-414169

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the short-term effects of myocapsular flap repair through minimal posterior approach in Hip arthroplasty with traditional posterior approach in hip arthroplasty in elderly femoral neck fractures. Methods From August 2007 to may 2009, a total of 126 femoral neck fracture patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 63 patients treated with myocapsular flap repair through minimal posterior approach (the modified group), and 63 patients treated with traditional posterior approach (the traditional group). Fifty-eight patients underwent the first-ever total hip replacement and 68 patients underwent artificial double-acting femoral head replacement. Eighty-four cases were inserted with cemented implants and 42 cases with uncemented. Data of incision length, operation time, blood loss volume, drainage amount, blood transfusion volumes were recorded separately. Postoperative complications related to the surgery and hip joint function were also documented. Function of hip joint was scored with Harris scale. All data were statistically analyzed. Results Five patients died within 1 year of surgery, and 4 patients dropped out. All the remained 117 patients were followed up for 12 - 24 months. There were no significant difference in age, type of fracture and artificial the incision length in the modified group was significantly shorter than that in the traditional group([ 10. 5 ± 2. 4 ]cm vs [ 17. 2 ± 3.6 ] cm, t = 3. 012, P = 0. 004). The average operating time was significantly shorter in the modified group compared to the traditional group (t = 2. 455, P = 0. 038). Blood loss, drainage amount, blood transfusion volumes in the modified group were less than those in the traditional group( t = 3.211,2. 986 and 3. 352 ,Ps < 0. 01, respectively). Conclusion Myocapsular flap repair through minimal posterior approach in Hip arthroplasty is a reasonable, mini invasive technique for hip replacement in older with a less blood loss and shorter operating time.fractures

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL